Tiger Woods appeared in Martin County court on September 2, 2026 and resolved his Florida DUI case with pleas to reckless driving and refusal to submit to a lawful test. His driver's license is suspended for five years and he was fined $1,000. The original DUI with property damage charge was reduced to reckless driving as part of the agreement.
The one thing that answer leaves open is whether the plea was guilty or no contest, because credible outlets reported both. That matters legally and it's the third section.
Built on: the Associated Press report carried by WLRN, court-record reporting from WPTV via Tampa Bay 28, CBS News and CBS12 coverage of the hearing, Rolling Stone's report on the original plea, and NBC News' archived coverage of the 2017 case.
What happened in court
A change of plea, a reduced charge, and a five-year suspension.
Reporting from Tampa Bay 28 says Judge Darren Steele accepted a plea agreement that amended the original DUI with property damage charge to reckless driving, second offense, and resolved the refusal-to-submit charge as well. Woods also entered a plea to a careless driving citation.
On the reckless driving charge he received a $1,000 fine, a five-year driver's license suspension and $18.44 payable to the state attorney's office, per the same report. The AP, via WLRN, says he was fined court costs on the refusal charge.
TMZ reported the judge warning Woods that driving on the suspended license could put him back in jail.
He arrived with his girlfriend, Vanessa Trump, said little during the hearing, and left without addressing reporters, per the AP.
The crash that started it
March 27, 2026. South Beach Road, Jupiter Island. A double solid line.
CBS12's account of the investigation says Woods attempted to pass a pickup truck towing a trailer, crossed double solid lines, and struck the trailer, causing his Range Rover to roll onto its side. Deputies later reported signs of possible impairment.
Heavy's report of the arrest affidavit says he submitted to a breath test that registered no alcohol but refused to provide a urine sample. That report also says officers found two hydrocodone pills in his possession, while Tampa Bay 28 states no drugs or medication were found in his vehicle. Those two claims can both be true and I'm flagging them rather than reconciling them.
He was arrested that day and spent the state-mandated eight hours in custody before receiving bail.
Rolling Stone reported the not-guilty plea entered on March 31 by attorney Douglas Duncan, along with a demand for a jury trial and a waived arraignment that had been set for April 23.
Guilty or no contest? Why the wording matters
Two words, two different legal meanings, and the coverage split down the middle.
The AP's report says Woods pleaded no contest to reckless driving and no contest to refusing to submit to testing. Tampa Bay 28's headline also says no contest, though its own body text refers to guilty pleas in places. CBS News, Yahoo, TMZ, Heavy and CBS12 all report a guilty plea.
Here's what the difference is, per the AP's own explanation. A no-contest plea is not an admission of guilt, but means the accused offers no defense, and it's treated as a conviction in the criminal justice system.
So the outcome is identical either way. The license goes, the fine gets paid, the conviction stands. What differs is whether Woods formally admitted the conduct, which can matter in any civil proceeding that follows.
I couldn't open the court filing itself, so I can't tell you which is right. What I can tell you is that "BREAKING: pleads guilty" went out across social media before anyone checked the document, and the AP, which sat in the room, used a different word.
Why there was no diversion program this time
Because he's used it once already.
NBC News reported in October 2017 that Woods resolved a Palm Beach County DUI case by pleading guilty to reckless driving and entering a diversion program: a year on probation, a $250 fine, DUI school, 20 hours of community service and a victim-impact workshop. Flag that year.
That arrest came after officers found him asleep in his Mercedes about 15 miles from his Jupiter home. A toxicology report showed painkillers, sleep medication and an active ingredient of marijuana in his system, per NBC.
CBS12's pre-hearing coverage quoted a legal analyst explaining that because Woods had already gone through the diversion program, that option wasn't available in the current case, and that jail time remained possible depending on the plea.
That's why "reckless driving, second offense" is the phrase in the court record. It's also why a five-year suspension rather than the softer 2017 outcome.
What happened to his golf in between
He stepped away, and the court let him leave the country for treatment.
Heavy reports that after the crash Woods said he needed time to focus on his health and received court permission to travel outside the United States for treatment. His first public appearance afterward came in June, at a PGA Tour event announcing its plans.
Tampa Bay 28 adds that prosecutors subpoenaed his medical records in June, seeking documentation of any statements about substance use, drug screen results and testing procedures from his hospitalization.
None of that reporting says anything about when or whether he'll play again, and neither will I. He's 50, per the AP, and nobody who's covered him for three decades would guess at a schedule right now.
Four things in the breaking coverage that need correcting
The first hour after a celebrity court hearing is when the record gets scrambled, and this one got scrambled thoroughly.
- "Woods pleaded guilty." The AP, reporting from the courtroom, says no contest on both charges. Several other outlets say guilty. Both readings produce a conviction, but they aren't the same plea, and nobody has published the document.
- "He was convicted of DUI." He wasn't. The DUI with property damage charge was amended to reckless driving as part of the agreement, per the court-record reporting.
- "It happened Thursday." CBS12's report says Thursday. The hearing was Wednesday, September 2, which every other outlet and the court schedule confirm.
- "He was drunk." The breath test registered no alcohol, per multiple reports. Deputies reported signs of possible impairment and he refused a urine sample. That's the extent of what's on the record.
FAQ
What did Tiger Woods plead to?
Reckless driving, second offense, and refusal to submit to a lawful test, along with a careless driving citation. The AP reports the pleas as no contest; CBS News and others report them as guilty. The original DUI with property damage charge was reduced as part of the agreement.
What was the punishment?
A five-year driver's license suspension and a $1,000 fine on the reckless driving charge, plus $18.44 to the state attorney's office, per court-record reporting. He was fined court costs on the refusal charge. The judge warned that driving on the suspended license could result in jail.
What happened in the crash?
On March 27, 2026, investigators say Woods tried to pass a pickup truck towing a trailer on South Beach Road, crossed double solid lines and hit the trailer, rolling his Range Rover onto its side. A breath test showed no alcohol. He refused a urine sample and deputies reported signs of possible impairment.
Why didn't Woods get a diversion program like in 2017?
Because Florida's program is a one-time option and he used it in Palm Beach County in 2017, when he pleaded guilty to reckless driving and completed probation, DUI school and community service. A legal analyst told CBS12 that route was unavailable in the current case.
Is a no-contest plea a conviction?
Yes. The AP's report explains that a no-contest plea isn't an admission of guilt but means the accused offers no defense, and it's treated as a conviction. The practical penalties are the same as a guilty plea. The distinction can matter in any related civil case.
The Raw Verdict
The outcome is clear and the reporting isn't. A reduced charge, a five-year suspension, a thousand-dollar fine. Whether the word entered was guilty or no contest is a detail that the wire service in the room and the cable network outside it disagree on, and it went around the world before anyone read the filing.
Read the AP version and wait for the document. That's the only honest position on a story where the man himself said almost nothing, and everyone else said too much too fast.